@pat_nadolny Question about the various Auth0 taps:

tap-auth0

(Matatika variant) now supports Auth0 logs (credit to @daniel_walker), as well as users and clients - however there is a separate tap

tap-auth0-logs

, which supports only Auth0 logs. The hub shows these taps separately as “Auth0” and “Auth0 Logs”, which sort of implies that if you want Auth0 log data you have to use a

tap-auth0-logs

tap. Do you think there is grounds to merge these all under “Auth0”? We had a brief discussion about this on the initial MR, but at the time we did not support the logs resource.

@Reuben (Matatika) sorry for the delay - yeah I see the problem here. To me it makes sense to roll them under the same namespace. I think the pattern originally was to append a descriptor to the end of a tap when two variants have totally different features but pull from the same source. It sounds like at this point your variant covers all features so we can just list the

Auth0 Logs

as an alternative variant to your standard

Auth0

tap. I'm not sure if this is easy fix or not, would you mind opening an issue in the MeltanoHub repo? Or if you want to take a stab at making the change, that would be cool too.

No worries - hope you had a good time in Lisbon! 😎 I’ll create an issue and MR.