Not sure the best channel for this
Just tried uv ...
# best-practicesv
visch
05/02/2024, 4:19 PMNot sure the best channel for this
Just tried uv for one of our projects. This one the normal clean install time is ~45 seconds.
With uv and a non-warm cache it goes down to ~15 seconds. With uv and a warm cache
meltano install --clean👀 3
dancingpenguin 1
visch
05/02/2024, 4:19 PMThanks @Edgar Ramírez (Arch.dev) 😄
➕ 3
💯 2
m
Matt Menzenski
05/02/2024, 6:54 PMyeah, there’s no going back 😂
😄 1
r
Reuben (Matatika)
05/02/2024, 7:18 PM@aaron_phethean it might be time 🫡
➕ 1
💪 1
v
visch
05/02/2024, 10:51 PM@Reuben (Matatika) steps for us locally
pipx uninstall meltano
pipx install meltano[uv]
meltano config meltano set venv.backend uv
meltano install --clean
Ci was similar
🔥 1
visch
05/02/2024, 10:54 PMWindows docker container build time went down 30 percent.
Running directly on Windows the build time improved pretty well but we didn't see the crazy gain from a warm cache. Haven't dove into why
visch
05/07/2024, 4:12 PMI tested Windows, and it definitely gets the same increase with a warm cache. My problem is related to Docker builds and caching, which don't have anything to do with this. I think I'll see a massive improvement, though, if I make this work!
visch
05/10/2024, 1:18 PMhttps://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2810
Windows parallel installs fail fairly consistently due to this one. Swapping to
meltano install -p 1👍 1
e
Edgar Ramírez (Arch.dev)
05/15/2024, 1:39 AMI've put up a tracker for common uv issues: https://github.com/meltano/meltano/issues/8539
9 Views