Siba Prasad Nayak
06/27/2025, 8:11 AMswitch
statement to handle each connector individually, but that doesn't seem scalable.
Has anyone approached this problem before? I'd love to hear any recommendations or design patterns you'd suggest instead of a massive switch
case. In any case if meltano offers something which can solve my issue ?
Thanks!Reuben (Matatika)
06/27/2025, 9:25 AMmeltano config <tap> test
exists, but no equivalent for targets currently.Siba Prasad Nayak
06/27/2025, 9:44 AMSiba Prasad Nayak
06/27/2025, 9:45 AMReuben (Matatika)
06/27/2025, 9:54 AMmeltano config <tap> test
is.Siba Prasad Nayak
06/27/2025, 9:55 AMReuben (Matatika)
06/27/2025, 9:58 AMmeltano test
(which I haven't used before). Maybe worth exploring: https://docs.meltano.com/reference/command-line-interface/#testReuben (Matatika)
06/27/2025, 10:00 AMtest
(e.g. test-connection
), and then use meltano test
to run them - so you could feasibly have test commands defined for all your taps and targets and then run meltano test --all
.Siba Prasad Nayak
06/27/2025, 10:35 AMAndy Carter
06/27/2025, 11:34 AM